Good irrigation system design and maintenance has the potential to both lift productivity and reduce energy costs.

Distribution uniformity (DU) is a measure of how evenly an irrigation system applies water. Low DU means that some parts of the crop are too wet while others are under-watered. Many growers compensate by irrigating to satisfy the driest area of the crop. This extends irrigation run times, increasing power consumption.

In WA the additional power used to overcome poor DU was estimated to increase power consumption by 700 KWh/ha per year across 16 vegetable growers, with the worst irrigation system adding 2,000 KWh/ha annually to the power bill of one grower.

Energy costs can also be reduced by making sure the irrigation system is running at the designed pressure and flow rate, or changing the system to reduce the required pressure.

Of the 16 vegetable properties in WA, 9 had acceptable irrigation systems. the other 7 had problems due to incorrect pipe sizes or lack of adjustment for slope. These problems were compensated for by increasing the pumping pressure and, therefore, the energy required to apply the same amount of water.

Improving DU ensures the entire crop receives the right amount of water, lifting total productivity as well as reducing power consumption.  Solid set and traveller irrigation systems for cauliflower, lettuce and sweet corn have all been found to have distribution uniformity of only around 70%. Increasing DU to 90% or more can increase yield by 7 – 13%.

Energy use varies greatly between systems. For example, while furrow irrigation may require only 45 KWh / ML, a high pressure traveller may require 543 KWh / ML. In the Tasmanian example shown below, energy savings of 66% and a total cost saving of $47.12 / ML can be obtained by changing from a high pressure travelling gun to a low pressure centre pivot.

However, the biggest advantage in changing irrigation systems may be improved crop management with resulting increases in yield and quality. For example, replacement of a travelling gun with a centre pivot in a NSW farm provided an energy saving of around $50/ha. But the bigger benefit was a 20% increase in yield and improved product quality. Combined, these resulted in a net benefit of $565/ha.

Moving and pressurising water requires a lot of energy. As a result irrigation is the major energy user in growing vegetables.

For most growers, improving productivity, i.e. increasing the revenue for the amount of energy used, is more important to the bottom-line than simply improving the energy efficiency and reducing energy costs.

Managing irrigation well delivers improvements in water productivity ($/ML) through increases in yield and/or quality and hence revenue per ML of water applied.  In a similar way improving energy productivity ($/KWh) will be more about increases in yield and/or quality and hence revenue per KWh of energy used. This productivity approach will be a stronger motivator than simply reducing the cost, whether it is for water or energy.

There are three areas where irrigation improvements could increase energy productivity or reduce energy usage, these being:

• Crop management.
• Irrigation system design and maintenance.
• Pump efficiency.